Skip to main content

About your Search

20120927
20120927
Search Results 0 to 12 of about 13 (some duplicates have been removed)
everyone up, including the president of the united states? >> sean: it's frightening. you know, i really loved your book. i actually went back and started rereading it, knowing you'll be on the program today. i look at this president, and i think of woodward, your partner who's a little more left wing, and bernstein and watergate, all that you've been through in your career. we have a situation where i believe the president of the united states is purposely lying. let me tell you what i mean. when he keeps referring to this attack on our embassy, and all of the evidence, including the libyan president, there were two waves of attack, mortars were used, i don't think a spontaneous attack -- i don't think somebody was holding a rocket-propelled grenade with them. it's on the anniversary of 9/11. the president keeps going back t nobody saw released in july as an excuse. that seems to me the type of story that the media would jump on and say, give us the facts here. why didn't we have beefed-up security on 9/11 at our consulate, at our embassies? where did we drop the ball here? they don't a
a look at slate. where one guy faults the united states for the silly first amendment. it's not them. it's us. i say we are turning in to big brother, but that's racist. >> eric: oh! >> bob: there's a start right there. >> greg: thank you. i am on muscle relaxants, no wonder what i did there. >> kimberly: no wonder you're so friendly. >> greg: i'm friendly all the time. you just ignore me. you talk about the polls. i want to talk about rush limbaugh. he's talking about how the polls reflect the mind set or ideology of democrats, not america as whole. take it from there. >> the purpose of the people right now, most of them doing the polls, they're trying to make news, not reflect it. advancing an agenda. they all have different jobs. the polls are the replacement refs. they watch and they see certain things and don't see other things. they don't call certain things. other things go by. it has to be some truth to that, right? >> bob: no. they're not all republicans or democrats. rush, stick to what he does well, a radio talk show host. not try to second guess pollsters. you can argue about
the united states is weak and withdrawing and you do that, you leave a power vacuum. jenna: joining us now, -- kt mcfarland, fox security analyst. you worked inside a variety of administration as part of the defense department. what do you think is going on here? >> initially, jenna, i thought, okay they don't want to be accused after mission accomplished moment. president said we won the war or terror. bin laden is dead and now he is campaigning. if it looks like there was terrorist attack or maybe al qaeda affiliation they don't want to say that so they really didn't want to have that mission accomplished banner behind them going into an election. now if what we just uncovered here at fox news with bret baier, if the administration knew on day one it was not only a terrorist attack but it was an al qaeda attack, if they knew before day one because there was a defense department public report saying al qaeda in libya, a profile, what did they know and when did they know it? i worked in the white house during water gaet -- watergate, the steady constant drip, drip, drip, the story changed
and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the muslim world. i have made it clear that the united states government had nothing to do with this video. >> kimberly: so the question is, have they been lying? the issue now, eric, is are they lying? are they incompetent, both? did they know already? why now all of a sudden the change? >> eric: you know, i'm not more concerned that they didn't know or they did know. but clearly, if the interim president of libya says it was a terrorist attack, preplanne preplanned, preplanned terrorist attack. we go with him. he is there and boots on the ground. more intel than we do. not to say that president obama season kind of right saying he had the violence that spreading throughout the middle east is because of the movie. it may be. the four people who are dead aren't dead because of the movie. they're dead because of a terrorism attack. >> dana: who spread the word about the movie? >> greg: that is the question. that is the million-dollar question. we don't have a smoking gun. we have a smoking bazooka. primary source with inside information, which me
speech he would say the united states was the only country on earth where we put our hands over our hearts when we sing our national anthem, which was quickly disproved by just looking on youtube. people around the world going like this and singing their national anthem. he dropped at the very next day. he never said it again. >> he paid the price. >> maybe. >> i would say that is an example of actually changing behavior, which i think happens rarely and in small increments. >> i think the other thing we were talking about before the panel with brendan, the other thing we do not know, how many conversations are going on with campaign message people, with people making ads, with speechwriters, they are talking about wording. how often are they saying, if we say that, the fact checkers will get us? i suspect that is happening a lot. the only evidence i have of that is a column written by connie schultz, who is married to sherrod brown, who says that happens in the brown campaign. i suspect that is happening in many campaigns. there is so much fact checking going on, not just with our
the contact, because he knows it's not popular domestically in the united states. however good it is for his image internationally. so he did the absolute minimum and then he got out of town. >> greta: after the prime minister netanyahu gives his speech and goes back to israel, map out what you think will happen in the next couple weeks, if anything. >> well, i don't know. i don't necessarily think there's going to be anything spectacular before our election. i think israel understands that the only thing between iran and nuclear weapons as long as obama is president is the possibility of an israeli military strike. i think israel's decision one way or another on what to do will be based on physics and not politics. they will look at the iranian program and wait as long as they can, but they won't wait beyond that point. i think that has nothing to do with our electoral calendar. >> greta: and the variable here, of course, is the intelligence. how much time is there and, you know, we simply don't know. >> no. i think israel -- >> greta: it's been bad before, at least from my perspective, i d
'm running for president of the united states. >> if by his own admission he hasn't accomplished that, why should we give him another chance? >> i've learned lessons over the last four years. the most important lesson i've learned is that you can't change washington from the inside. you can't change from the inside. >> he said he can't change washington from inside. we'll give him that chance in november. this is time for a new president. i'll get the job done. we'll restore the economic strength we need to put people back to work. >> sean: the whole campaign was about changing washington, change, change, change, but i can't do it. what an acan you imagine if geoh said that? >> well, the barack obama brand is broken. i mean, the coca-cola, the brand of obama is broken. here's the thing. this president's in love with being president. he's not in love with doing the job of president. that's the big disconnect. he's not real anymore. he's not who he said he was. it's time for barack obama -- you know, he hasn't done it for -- in three quarters of years, but it's time for him to exhibit the le
Search Results 0 to 12 of about 13 (some duplicates have been removed)